hr.cafe
Share your story
Pay & Payroll Practical people operations Manager support High class-action & AG enforcement volume

Writing Multi-State Remote Job Pay Ranges Across CO, CA, NY, WA, IL, MN, MA, NJ, and VT

Posting a $90,000 to $240,000 catch-all salary band exposes your company to statutory good-faith penalties and applicant class actions. Build defensible geographic pay zones, explicit benefit blocks, and internal promotion notices across nine states.

Writing Multi-State Remote Job Pay Ranges Across CO, CA, NY, WA, IL, MN, MA, NJ, and VT — hr.cafe field guide banner
Controlling authorities: Colo. Rev. Stat. § 8-5-201 & Cal. Lab. Code § 432.3 · Wash. Rev. Code § 49.58.110 & N.Y. Lab. Law § 194-b · 820 ILCS 112/10, Minn. Stat. § 181.173 & M.G.L. c. 149, § 105F · N.J.S.A. 34:6B-23 & 21 V.S.A. § 495o Portable tool: Nine-State Remote Posting Gate & Copy-Ready Zone Compensation Block
Jurisdiction
US Multi-State · CO, CA, NY, WA, IL, MN, MA, NJ & VT Statutes
Employer threshold
1+ CO employee · 4+ NY · 5+ VT · 10+ NJ · 15+ CA/WA/IL · 25+ MA · 30+ MN
Decision trigger
Publishing a US-remote or hybrid requisition, third-party board sync, or internal promotion
Review cadence
Reviewed on state DOL/AG pay-transparency updates or appellate rulings
Direct Operational Answer

Direct operational answer

Any remote job capable of being performed in Colorado, California, New York, Washington, Illinois, Minnesota, Massachusetts, New Jersey, or Vermont must publish a good-faith compensation range—and in WA, CO, IL, MN, and NJ, a concrete summary of benefits and variable pay—once state headcount thresholds apply. Under the hr.cafe posting protocol, HR replaces sham $150,000-spread bands with explicit three-zone geographic ranges and triggers mandatory internal promotion notices before filling seats.

Why "Remote — US ($90,000 to $240,000)" Fails Statutory Good-Faith Audits

Inflated catch-all salary bands built by stitching a rural P10 minimum to a San Francisco P90 maximum violate statutory good-faith standards. Regulators audit what you actually budgeted for the requisition, not the outer edges of your HRIS grade table.

Recruiters under pressure to post a "Remote — US" role often paste the entire global grade spread—say, $90,000 to $240,000—thinking a wide bracket covers every state at once. Check the statutory text before publishing that number. California Labor Code § 432.3(m)(3) defines "pay scale" as the salary or hourly wage range the employer reasonably expects to pay for the position. New York Labor Law § 194-b(7)(a) mandates the minimum and maximum annual salary or hourly range the employer in good faith believes at the time of the listing it is willing to pay. Colorado Revised Statutes § 8-5-201(2) and CDLE INFO #9A apply the same good-faith budgeted expectation test—and explicitly bar employers from writing "Remote (excluding CO)" to dodge disclosure on work performable anywhere.

Suppose your Finance approved-headcount requisition budgets $135,000 to $155,000 for a Senior Product Analyst in Chicago or Boston, up to $170,000 in San Francisco or Manhattan, and $122,000 to $140,000 in lower-cost US markets. Publishing "$90,000–$240,000" fails on both ends: you would never hire a qualified finalist at $90,000, and Finance would block any offer above $170,000 without re-leveling the requisition to Principal. In Washington State, where Wash. Rev. Code § 49.58.110 fueled hundreds of applicant lawsuits (subsequently amended in 2025 to provide a narrow written-notice cure window while retaining statutory damages of $100 to $5,000 per violation when uncured or willful), plaintiff firms screenshot sham spreads alongside third-party ATS scraper feeds.

Replace the single sham bracket with a Three-Zone Geographic Range Block where each zone carries a tight 18% to 28% min-to-max hiring spread tied directly to your approved Finance requisition budget. Publishing three clean lines takes 180 characters and eliminates both candidate mistrust and good-faith enforcement risk.

Run the Where-Could-It-Be-Performed Gate Across All Nine States

Stop relying on blog trackers arguing over whether 14, 17, or 20 states have pay-transparency laws. Anchor every requisition to a single operational question: where could this role physically or remotely be performed or report?

Across the core nine-state remote matrix—Colorado, California, New York, Washington, Illinois, Minnesota, Massachusetts, New Jersey, and Vermont (plus overlapping District of Columbia, Maryland, Hawaii, and Nevada rules)—jurisdiction attaches through three distinct hooks: (1) the role can be performed remotely inside the state, (2) the remote worker reports to a supervisor or office inside the state (specifically New York Labor Law § 194-b(1) and Illinois 820 ILCS 112/10(b-25)), or (3) the employer meets minimal in-state headcount.

Look at how quickly a 60-person US distributed company trips almost every state threshold:

  • 1-employee hook (Colorado): C.R.S. § 8-5-201 applies the moment you employ even one person in Colorado and post a job performable anywhere in the US.
  • 4-to-10-employee hooks (NY, VT, NJ): New York (N.Y. Lab. Law § 194-b) triggers at 4 employees; Vermont (21 V.S.A. § 495o, effective July 1, 2025) triggers at 5 employees (with at least 1 in VT) for jobs physically in VT or remote roles predominantly performing work for a VT office; New Jersey (N.J.S.A. 34:6B-23, effective June 1, 2025) triggers at 10 or more employees over 20 calendar weeks (whether inside or outside NJ, if doing business, employing, or taking applications in NJ).
  • 15-employee hooks (CA, WA, IL): California (Cal. Lab. Code § 432.3), Washington (RCW 49.58.110), and Illinois (820 ILCS 112/10, effective Jan. 1, 2025) all trigger at 15 employees (with CA and WA counting 15 total employees when at least 1 works in-state, and IL applying to jobs physically in IL or remote roles reporting to an IL supervisor/office).
  • 25-to-30-employee in-state hooks (MA, MN): Massachusetts (M.G.L. c. 149, § 105F, effective Oct. 29, 2025) covers employers with 25+ employees with a primary place of work in MA; Minnesota (Minn. Stat. § 181.173, effective Jan. 1, 2025) covers employers with 30+ employees at one or more sites in MN.
Portable Compliance Gate · hr.cafe

Nine-State Remote Posting, Benefits Text & Internal Promotion Matrix

State & Statute Headcount & Remote Reach Benefits & Bonus Summary Required? Internal Promotion / Transfer Rule
Colorado
C.R.S. § 8-5-201
1+ employee in CO; covers any remote US job performable in CO. Yes: general description of all benefits + bonuses, commissions, or other pay; plus application deadline. Announce job opportunities to all CO staff before selection + post-hire career-progression notice within 30 days.
Washington & Illinois
RCW 49.58.110 · 820 ILCS 112/10
15+ employees (WA: 1+ in WA; IL: in-state or reporting to IL office/manager). Yes: general description of health, retirement, paid time off, and bonuses/stock/commissions (hyperlink allowed in IL). WA: disclose range on internal transfer/promotion request. IL: announce external postings internally within 14 calendar days.
Minnesota & New Jersey
Minn. Stat. § 181.173 · N.J.S.A. 34:6B-23
MN: 30+ in MN. NJ: 10+ total employees (over 20 wks) taking NJ apps or doing business in NJ. Yes: starting salary or range plus general description of all benefits and other compensation offered. NJ: make "reasonable efforts" to announce internal promotions across affected departments before making a promotion decision (except multi-year tenure progressions).
California & New York
Cal. Lab. Code § 432.3 · N.Y. Lab. Law § 194-b
CA: 15+ (1+ in CA). NY: 4+ (jobs in NY or remote reporting to NY supervisor/office). Base range required (NY requires commission plan description if paid by commission; CA requires current-employee range on request). NY covers internal promotions/transfers; CA requires providing pay scale to any current employee for their current role upon request.
Massachusetts & Vermont
M.G.L. c. 149 § 105F · 21 V.S.A. § 495o
MA: 25+ primary work in MA. VT: 5+ (1+ in VT) for VT or VT-office remote roles. Annual salary or hourly wage range reasonably expected (plus commission/piece-rate terms where applicable). MA: must provide pay range to employees offered a promotion or transfer to a new position with different responsibilities, and on request for current role.

Writing "generous PTO and full health benefits" violates Washington, Colorado, Illinois, Minnesota, and New Jersey disclosure rules. Lock a standardized four-sentence total-rewards block into every ATS requisition template.

Audit how third-party job aggregators scrape your ATS. Under Illinois 820 ILCS 112/10(b-25) and California Labor Code § 432.3(c)(3), if you hand a requisition to an external agency or let your ATS auto-syndicate to job boards, you remain legally responsible for transmitting the pay scale and benefits summary—and auditing that the aggregator did not truncate the footer! Specifically, Washington L&I administrative policy requires naming the actual categories of insurance (medical, dental, vision, life, disability), retirement plans (401(k) and whether matched), and paid time off/sick leave days or accrual structure, rather than generic marketing adjectives.

Watch Colorado's unique application-window requirement too. Under C.R.S. § 8-5-201(2)(c) and CDLE rules, every covered job posting must state the date the application window is anticipated to close (unless the requisition is an ongoing evergreen pipeline accepting applications continuously, which must be stated explicitly, and you may extend the window if unfilled by updating the date before expiration).

Compensation, Geographic Pay Zones & Total Rewards Disclosure

Good-Faith Base Salary Range (Full-Time Exempt, Paid Semi-Monthly):
Our budgeted base salary hiring range for this role is determined by the candidate's primary US work location across three geographic cost-of-labor zones, alongside relevant experience and demonstrated skills:
  • Zone 1 (San Francisco Bay Area, NYC Metro, Seattle Metro): $152,000 – $176,000 / year
  • Zone 2 (Boston/MA, Chicago/IL, Denver/Boulder/CO, NJ, Los Angeles/San Diego, DC/MD/VA): $138,000 – $160,000 / year
  • Zone 3 (All Other Eligible US Remote Locations, including MN & VT): $126,000 – $146,000 / year

Variable Compensation & Equity:
This position is eligible for an annual discretionary corporate performance bonus targeted at [10%] of eligible base earnings under our Annual Bonus Plan, plus an initial new-hire equity grant under the Company Stock Plan subject to Board approval and vesting terms.

Benefits Summary:
Full-time employees (30+ hrs/week) are eligible on the [first of the month following hire / hire date] for:
  • Health & Welfare: Medical (PPO and HSA-compatible HDHP options), dental, and vision insurance; company-paid basic life, AD&D, and short-/long-term disability coverage; Health Care and Dependent Care FSAs.
  • Retirement: 401(k) plan with [100% match up to 4% of eligible compensation].
  • Paid Time Off & Leave: [18 days] accrued Paid Time Off per year, [10] paid company holidays, statutory paid sick and safe time (minimum [56 hours / state statutory floor]), and up to [12 weeks] paid parental leave per policy. Full benefit details: [https://careers.example.com/benefits-summary].

Anticipated Application Window:
Applications for this posting are accepted through [Month Day, 2026] (window may be extended if the role remains open).

Close the Internal Promotion and Third-Party Syndication Blind Spots

External job postings attract applicant testers, but unposted tap-on-the-shoulder promotions trigger internal employee complaints in Colorado, Illinois, New Jersey, and Massachusetts. Wire internal notice gates directly into your HRIS job-change workflow.

Three silent promotion traps trip up growing people operations teams even when external career pages look spotless:

  1. Illinois's 14-day internal announcement clock (820 ILCS 112/10(b-25)): Whenever you publish an external job posting for a covered role, you must announce, post, or otherwise make known the opportunity to all current employees no later than 14 calendar days after publishing the external posting.
  2. New Jersey & Colorado pre-decision promotion announcements: Under N.J.S.A. 34:6B-23(a) and C.R.S. § 8-5-201(1), before finalizing an advertised or newly opened promotional seat, HR must make reasonable efforts to announce the opportunity internally (excluding automatic in-line career progressions based purely on years of service or performance—though Colorado still requires post-selection notice within 30 days to employees in eligible career-progression roles!).
  3. Massachusetts & Washington internal range handoffs: Even for an unposted lateral transfer or direct promotion offer in Massachusetts (M.G.L. c. 149 § 105F(b)(2)) or Washington (RCW 49.58.110(2)), HR must affirmatively provide the new position's pay range before or at the time of offering the transfer or promotion—and coordinate with EU entities where EU Directive 2023/970 Article 5 applies to cross-border transfers.

Train hiring leaders through your manager support intake checklist so nobody promises an unwritten promotion title or off-band remote offer before HR clears the state zone and internal notice check.

Talent Acquisition

Lock ATS templates so no remote requisition publishes without the Three-Zone Base Block, explicit Benefits/Bonus footer, CO close date, and automatic Day-1 internal job-board mirror.

Hiring Manager

Set realistic 20%–25% hiring spreads during requisition intake, never verbally promise an unposted promotion before HR checks NJ/CO/IL/MA rules, and never ask prior salary history.

Total Rewards / Legal

Audit third-party job boards monthly for truncated footers, route Washington cure notices within statutory deadlines if an error occurs, and retain posted range archives for 3+ years (Cal. Lab. Code § 432.3(c)(4)).

Primary statutes, regulations, and enforcement dockets

  1. Colorado Department of Labor and Employment — Equal Pay for Equal Work Act (C.R.S. § 8-5-201 & INFO #9A) — Official CDLE statutory text and interpretive guidance on remote postings, application close dates, and internal promotion/career-progression notices.
  2. Massachusetts Attorney General — Pay Transparency in Massachusetts FAQ (M.G.L. c. 149, § 105F) — AG enforcement guidance covering the 25-employee primary-workplace test, remote applicability, internal transfer/promotion disclosures, and civil penalty tiers.
  3. New Jersey Department of Labor — Pay and Benefit Transparency Law (N.J.S.A. 34:6B-23) — Covers the 10-employee threshold, mandatory pay and benefit summaries, and reasonable-efforts internal promotional announcements.
  4. Illinois General Assembly — Equal Pay Act Pay Scale and Benefits Disclosure (820 ILCS 112/10) — Establishes the 15-employee threshold, remote supervisor/office nexus, third-party job-board transmission duties, and the 14-calendar-day internal notice rule.

Practitioner questions on the edge cases

Can we exclude residents of Colorado, California, Washington, and New York in the job posting to avoid listing a salary range?

If you genuinely refuse to hire in those states for tax, nexus, or operational reasons and strictly limit work locations to specific non-transparency states (for example, "Hybrid — Austin, TX or Atlanta, GA only"), out-of-state posting laws generally do not attach. However, Colorado CDLE explicitly warns that posting a true nationwide remote role while adding "Colorado residents need not apply" violates C.R.S. § 8-5-201—and excluding states still leaves NJ, IL, MN, MA, VT, MD, DC, HI, and NV to navigate.

Does linking to our public careers/benefits webpage satisfy the benefits-summary rule in Illinois, Washington, and Colorado?

Illinois (820 ILCS 112/10(b-25)) explicitly permits satisfying the benefits description via a relevant, publicly viewable, no-login hyperlink. However, Washington L&I and Colorado CDLE strongly scrutinize postings that omit core benefit categories from the posting body itself when scraped onto third-party boards that strip hyperlinks. Include our concise 4-line text summary plus the URL so every state is covered in one block.

What happens if a finalist's specialized skills justify offering $8,000 above our posted Zone 2 maximum?

Under California, New York, Colorado, and Massachusetts good-faith standards, an employer is not barred from paying above the posted maximum when a specific finalist presents unanticipated qualifications—provided the original posted range reflected a genuine, documented good-faith budget at the time of posting, and you document the objective non-discriminatory rationale (to prevent Equal Pay Act compression claims from incumbents).

How long must we retain historical job postings and pay scales in our ATS archive?

California Labor Code § 432.3(c)(4) requires retaining job title and wage-rate history records for every employee throughout employment plus three years after termination, and Illinois 820 ILCS 112/10(c) requires preserving pay scale, benefits, and posting records for five years. Configure a 5-year immutable ATS snapshot archive as your nationwide baseline.

Get the Thursday edition

One email a week with new practitioner stories and primary-sourced HR playbooks. Free, and one click to unsubscribe.

Weekly on Thursdays. Your email is used for nothing else. Privacy.

Keep reading

Where this decision connects to neighboring statutory clocks and workflows.

All field guides

First-person practitioner stories on these topics

Field Note

The investigation finding I got wrong

A detailed, consistent account felt like enough. One question from my manager changed the finding, and two months later it mattered.

HR business partner (example) 2 min read
Esc